ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BAHASA INGGRIS MAHASISWA PARIWISATA ITB STIKOM AMBON DALAM KONTEKS INDUSTRI PERHOTELAN
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan Bahasa Inggris mahasiswa Program Studi Pariwisata ITB STIKOM Ambon dalam konteks kebutuhan industri perhotelan. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini menggali secara mendalam pengalaman, persepsi, dan tantangan yang dihadapi mahasiswa dalam mengembangkan kemampuan komunikasi berbahasa Inggris untuk keperluan profesional di bidang hospitality. Informan penelitian berjumlah dua belas orang, terdiri dari delapan mahasiswa aktif semester V dan VII, serta satu supervisor dari hotel berbintang di Kota Ambon. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam (in-depth interview), observasi partisipatif di kelas dan lingkungan kampus, serta studi dokumentasi terhadap dokumen kurikulum dan portofolio pembelajaran mahasiswa. Analisis data menggunakan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldana (2014) dengan tahapan kondensasi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Keabsahan data dijamin melalui triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan tiga tema utama: (1) ketimpangan yang signifikan antara kemampuan bahasa Inggris reseptif dan produktif mahasiswa, dengan keterampilan berbicara menjadi hambatan terbesar; (2) dominasi kecemasan berbahasa (language anxiety) sebagai faktor psikologis yang menghambat praktik komunikasi nyata; serta (3) minimnya ruang ekologis berbahasa Inggris di lingkungan kampus dan kehidupan sosial mahasiswa. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan transformasi pendekatan pembelajaran menuju model English for Specific Purposes (ESP) berbasis hospitality, penguatan komunitas praktik berbahasa, dan kolaborasi institusional yang lebih intensif dengan industri perhotelan lokal.
Rincian Artikel
Referensi
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in
language testing. Oxford University Press.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative
research for education: An introduction to
theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson
Education.
Bosher, S., & Smalkoski, K. (2002). From needs
analysis to curriculum development: Designing
a course in health-care communication for
immigrant students in the USA. English for
Specific Purposes, 21(1), 59–79.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of
communicative approaches to second language
teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1),
–47.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative
inquiry and research design: Choosing among
five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes
and motivation in second language learning.
Newbury House.
Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. Stanford
University Press.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986).
Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern
Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
Huhta, M., Vogt, K., Johnson, E., & Tulkki, H. (2013).
Needs analysis for language course design: A
holistic approach to ESP. Cambridge University
Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for
Specific Purposes: A learning-centred approach.
Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence.
In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics
(pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.
Kaewpet, C. (2009). Communication needs of Thai
civil engineering students. English for Specific
Purposes, 28(4), 266–278.
| JIKOMSTIK
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in
second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Leong, L. M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of
factors influencing learners' English speaking
skill. International Journal of Research in English
Education, 2(1), 34–41.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic
inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lockwood, J. (2012). Are we getting the right people
for the job? A study of English language needs in
international hotel chains. Journal of English for
Specific Purposes World, 11(33), 1–22.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle
effects of language anxiety on cognitive
processing in the second language. Language
Learning, 44(2), 283–305.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014).
Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook
(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian
kualitatif (edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning:
Gender, ethnicity and educational change.
Pearson Education.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching.
Cambridge University Press.
Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2021). Integrating ESP into
tourism education: A needs analysis at
Indonesian polytechnics. Indonesian Journal of
Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 78–91.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and
evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE
Publications.
Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language
learning. Oxford University Press.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of
language learning: A sociocultural perspective.
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wahyuni, S. (2014). The correlation between anxiety
and speaking skill of the Indonesian EFL college
students. Journal on English as a Foreign
Language, 4(2), 85–92.
Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2006). The teaching of
EFL speaking in the Indonesian context: The state
of the art. Bahasa dan Seni, 34(2), 269–292.
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom
environment: What does language anxiety
research suggest? Modern Language Journal,
(4), 426–439